0.03/0.12	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_6002 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.35	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.14/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.14/0.35	% WCLimit    : 180
0.14/0.35	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 13:25:10 EDT 2023
0.14/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.48	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8ajGMSWnJ6/Vampire---4.8_6002
0.21/0.48	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 6343 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-DHHFMSBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 405s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 91s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting lpo8_s with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# lpo9_lambda_fix with pid 6356 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by lpo9_lambda_fix
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHHN.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-DHHFMSBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFSBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 405s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 91s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting lpo8_s with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 102s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.21/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# Proof found!
0.21/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_22, type, cNAT: (($i > $o) > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_23, type, cSUCC: (($i > $o) > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_24, type, cZERO: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_25, type, epred1_0: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_26, type, epred2_1: ((($i > $o) > $o) > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_27, type, epred3_0: (($i > $o) > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(cNAT_def, axiom, ((cNAT)=(^[X3:($i > $o) > $o]:(![X5:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:((((X5 @ cZERO)&![X6:($i > $o) > $o]:(((X5 @ X6)=>(X5 @ (cSUCC @ X6)))))=>(X5 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8ajGMSWnJ6/Vampire---4.8_6002', cNAT_def)).
0.21/0.50	thf(cZERO_def, axiom, ((cZERO)=(^[X1:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8ajGMSWnJ6/Vampire---4.8_6002', cZERO_def)).
0.21/0.50	thf(cSUCC_def, axiom, ((cSUCC)=(^[X3:($i > $o) > $o, X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2)&(X3 @ (^[X4:$i]:((((X4)!=(X2))&(X1 @ X4)))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8ajGMSWnJ6/Vampire---4.8_6002', cSUCC_def)).
0.21/0.50	thf(cTTTP6101, conjecture, ![X7:($i > $o) > $o]:(((cNAT @ X7)=>(cNAT @ (cSUCC @ X7)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8ajGMSWnJ6/Vampire---4.8_6002', cTTTP6101)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((cNAT)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:($i > $o) > $o]:(![X5:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:((((X5 @ (^[Z1/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X9:$i]:((Z1 @ X9))))))&![X6:($i > $o) > $o]:(((X5 @ X6)=>(X5 @ (^[Z1/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X10:$i]:(((Z1 @ X10)&(X6 @ (^[Z2/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z2)!=(X10))&(Z1 @ Z2)))))))))))))=>(X5 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cNAT_def])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((cZERO)=(^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X2:$i]:((Z0 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cZERO_def])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((cSUCC)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:($i > $o) > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:$i]:(((Z1 @ X2)&(Z0 @ (^[Z2/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z2)!=(X2))&(Z1 @ Z2)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cSUCC_def])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((cNAT)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:($i > $o) > $o]:(![X5:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:((((X5 @ (^[Z1/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X9:$i]:((Z1 @ X9))))))&![X6:($i > $o) > $o]:(((X5 @ X6)=>(X5 @ (^[Z1/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X10:$i]:(((Z1 @ X10)&(X6 @ (^[Z2/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z2)!=(X10))&(Z1 @ Z2)))))))))))))=>(X5 @ Z0)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_6])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(![X7:($i > $o) > $o]:((![X11:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:((((X11 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X12:$i]:((Z0 @ X12))))))&![X13:($i > $o) > $o]:(((X11 @ X13)=>(X11 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X14:$i]:(((Z0 @ X14)&(X13 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X14))&(Z0 @ Z1)))))))))))))=>(X11 @ X7)))=>![X16:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:((((X16 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X17:$i]:((Z0 @ X17))))))&![X18:($i > $o) > $o]:(((X16 @ X18)=>(X16 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X19:$i]:(((Z0 @ X19)&(X18 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X19))&(Z0 @ Z1)))))))))))))=>(X16 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X15:$i]:(((Z0 @ X15)&(X7 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X15))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTTTP6101]), c_0_6]), c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X21:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o, X24:($i > $o) > $o]:(((((X21 @ (epred2_1 @ X21))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X12:$i]:((Z0 @ X12))))))|(X21 @ epred1_0))&(~(X21 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X14:$i]:(((Z0 @ X14)&(epred2_1 @ X21 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X14))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X12:$i]:((Z0 @ X12))))))|(X21 @ epred1_0)))&(((epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X17:$i]:((Z0 @ X17))))))&(~(epred3_0 @ X24)|(epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X19:$i]:(((Z0 @ X19)&(X24 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X19))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))))&~(epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X15:$i]:(((Z0 @ X15)&(epred1_0 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X15))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X5:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:(((X5 @ (epred2_1 @ X5))|(X5 @ epred1_0)|~((X5 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X68:$i]:((Z0 @ X68))))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X69:$i]:((Z0 @ X69)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X3:($i > $o) > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X70:$i]:(((Z0 @ X70)&(X3 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X70))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))|~((epred3_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_0 @ (epred2_1 @ epred3_0))|(epred3_0 @ epred1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X5:(($i > $o) > $o) > $o]:(((X5 @ epred1_0)|~((X5 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X71:$i]:(((Z0 @ X71)&(epred2_1 @ X5 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X71))&(Z0 @ Z1)))))))))))|~((X5 @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i > $o]:(~(?[X72:$i]:((Z0 @ X72))))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X73:$i]:(((Z0 @ X73)&(epred2_1 @ epred3_0 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X73))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))|(epred3_0 @ epred1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (epred3_0 @ epred1_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11]), c_0_15])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ (^[Z0/* 5 */:$i > $o]:(?[X74:$i]:(((Z0 @ X74)&(epred1_0 @ (^[Z1/* 8 */:$i]:((((Z1)!=(X74))&(Z0 @ Z1))))))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_16]), c_0_17]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 7
0.21/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 8
0.21/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
0.21/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 80
0.21/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.21/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 5
0.21/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 74
0.21/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
0.21/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.21/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.21/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 105
0.21/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 97
0.21/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
0.21/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 23
0.21/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.21/0.50	# NegExts                              : 13
0.21/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 2
0.21/0.50	# Total rewrite steps                  : 5
0.21/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 46
0.21/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.21/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.21/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 40
0.21/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
0.21/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 91
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 28
0.21/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 528
0.21/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 214
0.21/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
0.21/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
0.21/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.21/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.21/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 10452
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.016 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.019 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.073 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.012 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.085 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.21/0.50	% E---3.1 exiting
0.21/0.51	EOF